Tieteelliset lähteet: Vastine elintarviketeollisuusliitolle – terveysverot eivät murskaa kilpailukykyä

Epäterveellisten elintarvikkeiden tarjonta lihavuuden aiheuttajana.

Mustajoki P. Artikkeli: Ruokaympäristön muutos selittää pääosan väestöjen lihomisesta. Duodecim 2015; 131:1345-52.

Kirjoituksessa siteerataan kansainvälisiä tutkimuksia, jotka osoittavat epäterveellisten elintarvikkeiden runsastuneen tarjonnan pääasialliseksi syyksi globaaliin lihavuusepidemiaan.

Uudempia kansainvälisiä tutkimusartikkeleita aiheesta:

  • Zobel EH, Hansen TW, Rossing P ym. Global changes in food supply and the obesity epidemic. Curr Obes Rep 2016;5:449-55.
  • Gittelsohn J, Trude A. Diabetes prevention: changing the food environment in low income settings. Nutr Rev 2017;75 (Suppl 1): 62-9.
  • Hall K. Did the food environment cause the obesity epidemic? Obesity 2018; 26: 11-13.
  • Pineda E, Brunner EJ, Llewllyn CH ym. The retail food environment and its association with body mass index in Mexico. Int J Obes 2021; 45: 1215-28.

 

 

 

Tieteelliset lähteet: Elintarviketeollisuusliitto ei tiedä mitä ruokakaupoissa myydään

Kasvaneiden pakkaus- ja annoskokojen vaikutukset

Zlatevska N, Dubelaar C, Holden SS. Sizing up the effects of portion size on consumption: a meta-analysis. J Marketing 2014 

Livingstone MBE, Pourshahidi LK. Portion size and obesity. Adv. Nutr. 2014;5:829-34. 

Pomeranz JL, Brownell KD. Portion sizes and beyond – governements legal authority to regulate food industry practices. New Engl J Med 2012;367:1383-5. 

Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Jebb S ym. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. The Cochrane collaboration 2015, issue 9.

Terveysverojen vaikutuksia 

WHO: Public health product tax in Hungary: An example of succesful intersectorial action using a fiscal tool to promote healthier food choices and raise revenues for public health.

Linkki yhteenvetoon.

Lobstein T, Neveux M, Landon J. Costs, equity and acceptability of three policies to prevent obesity: A narrative review to support policy development. Obes Sci Practice 2020;6:562-83.

Linkki artikkeliin.

Harding M, Lovenheim M. The effect of prices on nutrition: comparing the impact of product- and-nutrient-specific taxes. NBER Working Paper Series January 2014.

Moore J, Fielding BA. Taxing confectionery, biscuits, and cakes to control obesity. BMJ 2019;366:I5298.

Sánchez-Romero, Canto-Osorio R, Colchero MA ym. Association between tax on sugar sweetend beverages and soft drink consumption in adults in Mexico: open cohort longitudinal abalysis of Heasth Workers Cohort Study. BMJ 2020; 369:m1311.

Nakhimovsky SS, Feigi AB, Avila C ym. Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163358.

Britannian sokeriveron vaikutuksia

Jones A, Wu JHY, Buse K. UK´s sugar tax hits the sweet pot. BMJ 2021;372:n463.

 

 

 

Tieteelliset lähteet: Ruokien pakkausmerkinnät – oikeus selkeään tietoon ravinnosta

Katsaus erilaisista pakkausmerkinnöistä:
Kanter R, Vanderlee L, Vandevijvere S. Front-of-package nutrition labelling policy: global progress and future directions. Publ Health Nutr 2018;21:1399-1408.

Chilen varoitusmerkit:
Corvalan C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communucable diseases epidemic: update on the Chilean law of food labelling and advertising. Obesity Rev 2019;0:367-74.

Pakkausmerkinnät ja vähemmän koulutetut:
Lobstein T, Neveux M, Landon J. Costs, equity and acceptability of three policies to prevent obesity: A narrative review to support policy development. Obes Sci Practice 2020;6:562-83.

Varoitusmerkit ymmärretään paremmin kuin liikennevalot:
Khandpur N, de Morais Sato P, Amaral Mais L ym. Are front-of-package warning labels more effective at communicating nutrition information than traffic-light labels? A randomixed controlled experiment in a Brazilian sample. Nutrients 2018;10:688.

Nieto C, Jáuregui A, Contreras-Manzano A ym. Understanding and use of food labeling system among Whites and Latinos in the United States and among Mexicans: Results from the International Food Policy Study, 2017. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2019;16:87.

Arrúa A, Cucutchet MR, Rey N ym. Impact of front-of-pack nutrition information and label design on children´s choice of two snack foods: comparison of warnings and the traffic-light system. Appetite 2017;116:139-46.

 

 

 

Tieteelliset lähteet, blogi: Suomalaisten ote lipsuu terveyden rinteessä 27.4.2021

 

 

 

 

Tieteelliset lähteet: Terveempi kansa – parempi työllisyys (4/2021)

Kirjoituksessa käytettyjä tieteellisiä lähteitä.

Ylipainoisia Suomessa Tutkimuksia ylipainon vaikutuksesta työkykyyn
  • Rissanen A, Heliövaara M, Knekt P, Reunanen A, Aromaa A, Maatela J. Risk of disability and mortality due to overweight in a Finnish population. BMJ 1990; 301(6756):835-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6756.835.
  • Roos E, Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O ym. Relative weight and disability retirement: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013;39:259-6
  • Korpela K., Roos E., Lallukka T. ym.: Different measures of body weight as predictors of sickness absence. Scand J Public Health, 2013; 41(1): 25-31.
  • Henriksson P, Henriksson H, Tynelius P ym. Fitness and body mass index during adolescence and disability later in life. Ann Intern Med 2019;170;230-9.
  • Santtila M, Pihlainen K, Koski H ym. Physical fitness in young men between 1975-ND 2015 with a focus on the years 2005-2015. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017; 50: 292-8.
  • Vesikansa A, Jokelainen J, Mehtälä J ym. Lihavuuden yhteys elämänlaatuun ja työkykyyn suomalaisessa aikuisväestössä. Suom Lääkl 2020; 45: 2377-82.
Ruokaympäristön muuttuminen syynä lihavuusepidemiaan
  • Mustajoki P. Ruokaympäristön muutos selittää pääosan väestöjen lihomisesta. Duodecim 2015; 131:1345-52.
  • Silventoinen K, Sans S, Tolonen H ym. Trends in obesity and energy supply in the WHO MONICA project. Int J Obesity 2004;28:710-8.
Liikennekuolemat
  • Liikennekuolemat vähentyneet reilusti. Toim. Jukka Harju, HS 3.2.2020

Yhteiskunnan toimia epäterveellisten elintarvikkeiden vähentämiseksi

  • Smith Taillie L, Busey E, Mediano Stolze F ym. Governmental policies ro reduce unhealthy marketing to children. Nutrition Reviews 2020; ahead of print
  • Public health product tax in Hungary: An example of succesful intersectorial action using a fiscal tool to promote healthier food choices and raise revenues for public health. WHO
  • Guerrero-López CM, Molina M, Colchero MA. Employment changes associated with the introduction of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and nonessential energy-dense food in Mexico. Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105S:S43-S49
  • Corvalan C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communucable diseases epidemic: update on the Chilean law of food labelling and advertising. Obesity Rev 2019;0:367-74.
  • Lobstein T, Neveux M, Landon J. Costs, equity and acceptability of three policies to prevent obesity: A narrative review to support policy development. Obes Sci Practice 2020;6:562-83.

Terveydenhuollon kulut 2000 – 2018

Tieteelliset lähteet – Terve Paino ry:n toimintaohjelma

Huhtikuussa 2020 julkaistussa

Terve Paino ry:n toimintaohjelma

Kirjoituksessa käytettyjä tieteellisiä lähteitä.

 

Ruokamarkkinoinnin vaikutuksista lapsiin

Gutteina Y, De Backer C, Smits T. Media food marketing and eating outcomes among pre-adolescents and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2019: 20: 1708-19.

Jenkin G, Madhvani N, Signal L, Bowers S. A systematic review of persuasive marketing techniques to promote food to children on television. Obesity Rev. 2014;15:281-93.

Harris JL, Pomeranz JL, Lobstein T, Brownell K. A crisis in the marketplace: How food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done. Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:211-25.

Kraak VI, Story M. Influence of food companies´ brand mascots and entertainment companies´ cartoon media characters on children´s diet and health: a systematic review and research needs. Obes Rev 2014;dec 17. doi:.

Freeman B, Kelly B, Baur L ym. Digital junk: food and beverage marketing on facebook. Am J Public Health 2014;104:e56-e64.

Pettigrew S, Tarabashkina L, Roberts M ym. The effects of television and Internet food advertising on parents and children. Public Health Nutr 2013;16:2205-12.

Muiden maiden ratkaisuja markkinoinnin rajoittamiseksi

Smith Taillie L, Busey E, Mediano Stolze F ym. Governmental policies ro reduce unhealthy marketing to children. Nutrition reviews 2020; ahead of print.

Corvalan C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communucable diseases epidemic: update on the Chilean law of food labelling and advertising. Obesity Rev 2019;0:367-74.

Haitallisten elintarvikkeiden verottaminen

Public health product tax in Hungary: An example of succesful intersectorial action using a fiscal tool to promote healthier food choices and raise revenues for public health. WHO.

Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C ym. Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. PLoS One 2016;26:e0163358.

Maurico H-F, Batis C, Rivera JA ym. Reduction in purchases of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods in Mexico associated with the intruduction of a tax in 2014. Prev Med 2019;jan:16-22.

Cobiac LJ, Tam K, Veerman L, Blakely T. Taxes and subsidies for improving diet and population health in Australia: A cost-effectiveness modelling study. PLOS Med 2017;14(2): e1002232. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002232.

Wise J. Sugar tax could stop 3,7 million UK people becoming obese, claims report. BMJ 2016;352:i1064.

Briggs DM, Tytton OT, Kehlbacher A ym. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence ov overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ 2013;347:f6189.

Carbera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM ym. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1072.